Quickie Review 5: Jexi Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

I shouldn't even be giving this film a quickie review. This is such a waste of time for everyone on board, and I just can't imagine a movie that could almost beat Loqueesha as the worst movie of 2019, but by george, Jexi, by writers and directors, Jon Lucas and Scott Moore almost beats it! 


Where do I even start with this trainwreck? Okay, I know where I need to start, what was this film trying to be? I'm usually on board with clunky, but ambitious films, but this film had no clear idea of what it wanted to be. Was it supposed to be a romantic comedy? Was it supposed to be a comedy? Was it supposed to be a quirky horror comedy with a psychotic phone AI? Was it meant to be this anti-phone commentary? It decides that it wants to be a KFC Famous Bowl and be all of the above. Unlike that thing though, this movie isn't good! You don't care about the chemistry between the characters, the commentary is spring roll wrap thin, the romantic and comedy elements aren't great, the characters aren't likable, and you get the idea. Like, was the moral to live life and throw away your phone? Well, yes, but no, because you still need your phone for our modern-day lives. It's like they had no real idea what to do, but had to turn in something to make a check. 


Oh, and let's get this out of the way, Adam DeVine, no matter how charming he can be, and good lord I know he's trying, isn't a male lead. He works as a secondary character to everyone else. He's extremely obnoxious, and it just reminds me why I hated him in Game Over, Man. However, while he is a lot of why this film doesn't work, none of the actors are given any service by being in this movie. The only one I think was almost at the point of making me keep this out of my top 10 worst for the year was Michael Pena. I mean, it's because he's Michael Pena, and he's an actor that can make almost anything work. 


Jexi almost beat out Loqueesha for the worst film of 2019, and I can't stand either film. Luckily, it seems like people are avoiding Jexi like the plague, as it's bombing in theaters, and while that sucks for everyone involved, it's just another example as to why people prefer to not go to theaters. Why should I go see something as half-baked and undercooked like Jexi, when I can simply turn on my Netflix and watch The Chef Show? A lot of the actors in this movie like Adam DeVine, Ron Funches, Michael Pena, Rose Byrne, Charlyne Yi, Alexandra Shipp, and Kid Cudi should have been in a better movie together. I almost would rather watch Rambo: Last Blood again. To the shock of no one, this is a movie I will not play again

 Thanks for reading the review! I hope you all enjoyed reading it! If you would like to support my work, make sure to share it out, and if you want to become a Patreon supporter, then you can go to patreon.com/camseyeview. I will see you all next time!

Quickie Review 4: Judy Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

It's award season, and it's not award season unless we get some biopic dramas of famous people played by actors who want to win a shiny gold trophy! I know that sounds a bit cynical, but it's hard not to be fully aware of why biopic dramas get made, and why they get released around award season. Still, I can't be angry when this is when we get some of the best performances of the year, and that's no different than with the Judy Garland biopic drama, Judy, by director Rupert Goold. 


Now, the biggest problem with most biopics, that sadly is in Judy, is that the lead actor is great, but everything else around it is middle of the road. Well, that's true here. The strongest element to Judy is Renee Zellweger as Judy. Sometimes her voice comes off as a little hokey, but for the most part, she brings it as Judy Garland at the lowest point of her career. You feel for her, and sympathize with how she was treated when she was the hottest ticket in Hollywood. Seriously, you just feel your skin crawl and are held back from throwing a drink at the screen any time her agent and Louis B. Mayer come on. You just want to strangle them for mistreating Garland at such a young age. It was even a surprise to me that Zellweger did her own singing, and she did a good job! The musical moments are another highlight of the film, and that's true with the final one where she sings Somewhere Over the Rainbow. The supporting cast of Finn Wittrock, Richard Cordery, Rufus Sewell, and Jessie Buckley put in some great performances. It's a well-cast film that was able to let the actors breathe and have their moments in-between the depressing points in Garland's career. 


Sadly, that's all the praise I have for the film. Now, that isn't to say Judy is a bad film, because it's not. I haven't seen a biopic that was truly terrible unless it entirely missed the point. No, the biggest problem is that it's another biopic drama during award season that has one really good element to it, but that's about it. The rest of the film isn't terrible, but it's very traditional. Even the performances from Garland's agent and the co-founder of MGM are a touch cartoony and one-dimensional. That's how many of the side characters are treated. There isn't a whole lot to them, and that's a shame. Even Renee's voice for Garland almost teeters into the cartoony territory. The problem is that I can tell this is a biopic more interested in awards than being a movie-going experience. It's not the worst of its kind, but the tropes and execution of these films are, to me, becoming way more noticeable. 


Listen, just because I'm calling it another standard biopic doesn't mean I hate it. I liked Judy, and I think it's one of the better biopic dramas that I have seen during the award season. However, it is just another biopic that kind of gets lost in the flood of other award-hopeful biopics. I recommend checking it out if you are curious. I don't think there is any rush seeing it in theaters, but I would rather watch this film than Joker again. It might be another biopic that is aiming to grab at awards, but it's better than most. It's a film I would play once, but never again. 

Thanks for reading the review! I hope you all enjoyed reading it! If you would like to support my work, make sure to share it out, and if you want to become a Patreon supporter, then you can go to patreon.com/camseyeview. I will see you all next time!

Quickie Review 3: Hustlers Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

You ever see a trailer for a film, and it makes you worried about how it's going to handle the premise? That's how I felt when I saw the first trailer for Lorene Scafaria's Hustlers. You think a film about strippers scamming huge sums of money out of Wallstreet and rich punks in a heist thriller would be sleazy and entirely male-gaze-centric. Luckily, with Lorene Scafaria's directing and writing, Jennifer Lopez and Constance Wu as the leads, you get quite a fun ride! 


Much of what makes this work is the dynamic chemistry between Constance Wu and Jennifer Lopez. I love how the two work off each other, as you have the young starry-eyed pupil and the veteran who knows what is what. The film has a lot of fun with the entire strip bar heist premise, and while the film is showing the characters in a negative light, and what they did was not okay, it is also executed in a way where you are enjoying the ride alongside them. It's a film that's fun to watch, knows what kind of tone is appropriate for it, and has great acting. While I don't know what the final lineup of Best Actress nominees will be, I can see why Jennifer Lopez is getting buzz. This might be her best role since Out of Sight, which is one of my favorite movies. She owns this film, and while the overall cast is great, she is leagues above everyone else. You also feel for Constance Wu and her situation, because sometimes, life doesn't give you a good hand, and you have to adapt and do what you can to survive or get out of that moment. 


I think the issues I have with the film are the same ones everyone else has. It's not a bad idea to do this as a sort of flashback-style story, but it does hurt the pacing, and it feels abrupt when the reporter character chimes in. They could have either told it as a linear story or done something more stylish with how the story was told. Also, any guy being a punk and complaining about Lizzo and Cardi B being in the film needs to just zip their lips. They are only in it for, like, five minutes. This is more of an issue with comments I see for the film, but still. People need to stop having a heart attack with these two appearing in the film. 

While it might not be the most original story told, and I am aware that some parts of the real-life story were changed for this film, I still really enjoyed Hustlers, and not because it has a bunch of beautiful women in it. It's a fun and amusing heist thriller that I would play it again! 

 Thanks for reading the review! I hope you all enjoyed reading it! If you would like to support my work, make sure to share it out, and if you want to become a Patreon supporter, then you can go to patreon.com/camseyeview. I will see you all next time!

Quickie Review 2: Joker Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

Before we do anything, let's get this out of the way. This review will not be based on the controversy pre-release, or Todd Phillips making himself look like a complete idiot during the press tour when he should have let the movie speak for itself, even if he does deserve all the flack he's getting for the comments made. Also, do not take your kids to see this film. I don’t know why parents are taking their kids to an obviously R-rated comic book flick about a killer clown. Educate yourself before you see this film. Now then, let's talk about one of the most controversial films of the year, Todd Phillips' Joker

 For the beginning of DC's new line of one-off/experimental stories, Joker had a lot to ride on, because, as I said previously if superhero movies want to stay relevant, they need to evolve beyond being simple superhero films. Unfortunately, while I am glad it's a financial success, I wish the film was a better experience. 

 Not to say there aren't good elements, because there is plenty to like or admire about Joker. As usual, when you have Joaquin Phoenix in your film, you should always expect a great performance, and that's no different here. Phoenix brings a very unhinged performance as Arthur aka the Joker. His performance is the best part of the movie. The film is full of incredibly unnerving scenes, from the moment he meets young Bruce Wayne, to his first comedy set, to the subway ride home. You will feel uncomfortable as you watch his demented rise into becoming the iconic character. Also, as many may misunderstand, you are, without a doubt, not meant to idolize this character. Sure, you feel bad for his situation and life, but the emotional investment is kept at an arm's length because even Todd Phillips knows you aren't meant to see this character as a proper state of being a positive role model. The rest of the cast is also quite stellar with Robert DeNiro, Zazie Beetz, and others. While this may be a comic book movie, and yes, it is a comic book movie, I do respect that it wanted to tackle themes about mental health, how our society is failing to help people with mental problems in need, and class disputes. It's always nice to see a film try to go the extra mile in wanting to be taken seriously and talk about uncomfortable subjects. 

 Like I said above though, it wants to tackle these topics, but I don't think the film knows how to. It has plenty of memorable scenes and that one Oscar-bait monologue scene with Phoenix talking to Robert DeNiro's character about how society and the rich have failed us, but it doesn't want to take that next step. It reminds me of last year's Vice, where Joker has a lot to say, but doesn't know how to properly continue the conversation, or even want to continue the conversation. It's like the writer and director got excited about it, but then realized they were way out of their zone and backed out with no real evolution of the conversation. It also doesn't help that it has plenty of plot elements and characters that could have been cut, or expanded upon. I don't know if Zazie Beetz was supposed to have more to do, but after a twist that happens with her, she is never seen or mentioned again. I think a better director like Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu would have done a better job with these themes.

 Even if the film knows that we aren't supposed to like him, Joker still tries a little to make us root for him, when you absolutely should not. As I said, everything feels a bit undercooked, and maybe a second viewing would help things out, but if I'm already picking up that the film doesn't really juggle its themes properly, then why should I invest more time into a film that already drags itself through its two-hour runtime? If you want to see Phoenix be the literal Joker, it's pretty much in the last 20 minutes of the film. I wouldn't mind this, and while it has its moments of being compelling, the fact it takes that long, and we don't see him as the infamous clown, is disappointing. 

 I was hoping we could move into the award-season batch of films without much conflict. I'm so tired of watching prestige films or films that won big at old and out-of-date film festivals that pick these films. I don't care much for them, because once we get our hands on them, we tend not to be on the same wavelength. It's an okay movie with one really strong award-hopeful performance and some nicely shot scenes. If you want a film that tackles this kind of story better, well, you will find those. I don't think a lot of the controversy was worth it, but I do respect the people that were concerned over the film's release, and if I see anyone that I know mock or harass anyone over the concerns/controversy or that they didn't like the film, you are a punk. Don't be a punk. I could recommend seeing Joker, and my mixed review isn't hurting its box office chances, but I could recommend way more movies, and especially Martin Scorcese films over Joker. Phillips obviously wanted this to be like one of Martin's films but didn't realize that directors like Tarantino and Scorcese make their film-making projects look easy. I'm more caught in the middle with how I rate this film, and I don't plan on changing my mind about it either. Please respect my wishes that I am indifferent to the film, and others are not going to like the movie either. I would recommend people watch Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot, Taxi Driver, Her, and You Were Never Really Here over Joker. Joker is a film I would play once, and then never again. 

 Thanks for reading the review! I hope you all enjoyed reading it! If you would like to support my work, make sure to share it out, and if you want to become a Patreon supporter, then you can go to patreon.com/camseyeview. I will see you all next time!


Quickie Review 1: Rambo: Last Blood


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

Parental Warning: If it wasn’t obvious, Rambo: Last Blood is Rated R for violence, drugs, and sexual situations. A lot of the hyper-violence you see in the marketing is in the last 20 minutes, but that’s beside the point. Viewer’s Discretion is Advised. I hope you all like the review!

I decided to change things up a bit, and do quick little reviews in-between the films that I consider to be highly rewatchable. Maybe I'll come back to these films and do full-fledged reviews, but I wanted to do something to liven things up a bit.

The Rambo franchise probably has one of the more confusing lineages of films. The first film wasn't really meant to be the beginning of this huge action franchise, but it happened, and now we have the supposed final film in the franchise with Rambo: Last Blood by director Adrian Grunberg.

 The premise of the film isn’t terrible, albeit unoriginal. The plot has Rambo now living in Arizona as a rancher taking care of an adopted Hispanic teenager, who goes to Mexico to find her real father. She ends up getting kidnapped by a Mexican cartel, and he has to go save her. Too bad the entire first 70 minutes of the film are filled with fairly generic plot points with characters introduced that you will never see again by the end of the film, and is pretty much like Stallone's version of Taken, but with Rambo. That should be cool, but the writing drags the experience down, along with the boring villains. If this is supposed to be Rambo's last hurrah, why not have it personally connect to his character? It's just another boilerplate cartel gang. It’s not even as pandering as last year’s Death Wish or Sicario: Day of the Soldado, they are more like a cartel you see in CSI or NCIS. I was sitting there waiting for something to be interesting, and you get a tiny bit of action when Stallone finds the girl, but it almost doesn't matter, due to how dull everything up to that point is.


It's not boring like Red Sparrow, but more in the vein of 2018's Proud Mary, where you get a taste of what makes the franchise great, but not much else until you hit the last 20 minutes. Even after the entertaining action sequence of Rambo fighting off the cartel, the film tries to end on a deep note for the franchise. I think I would have personally been mad if the final film in my franchise was this slap-dash dullfest. Like, at least the Taken films stayed cohesive and connected. Last Blood even tries to end on a montage of the franchise as this consistent poetic beauty of cinema, and that's not even the case.


Still, Stallone himself has the acting chops to pull you through the grimy streets of Mexico and back to the dry Arizona desert, but you can tell how little he is invested in this film compared to Creed II. The only reason to go see this film is for the last 20 or so minutes of action. It's truly a fun romp as the violence and gore are so over-the-top that it almost feels like it should belong in the John Wick films. It's the best part of the film by miles. If you want some intense action and gore, you will find it in this film.


I want to be angrier about this not being a great film, but I honestly can't. Don't get me wrong, I did not like this, but it's so boring, and there are other action films from 2019 that are way more obnoxious than Rambo: Last Blood. I don't think it's the worst film of 2019, nor do I think it's as bad as a lot of people are making it out to be, but there are so many other action movies to watch that are captain obvious levels of better. You could easily watch the John Wick series, The Equalizer films, Upgrade, Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle, the previous films in the Rambo franchise and even the parody film Hot Shots Part Deux, and get a more consistent experience than this film. If you couldn't tell by my review or the fact that no one is talking about this film, that this is a film I will not be playing again.

10: Ready or Not Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

It shouldn’t be hard to market a movie. You have all of the footage that may or may not be used in the final cut, you are told to show off what the film is about in two minutes. It shouldn’t be that hard, but studios and distributors find ways to bend and stretch what the film is about because they don’t have faith in the end product. There are many examples of a film being marketed, and the trailers showing off a film that’s not actually what the end product is. You have your Collateral Beauty, your I Kill Giants, and so on. That’s why it is refreshing when you watch a trailer, and what you see, is what you get. Today’s review is of a film that isn’t shy or nervous to hide what it’s about, Ready or Not from Fox Searchlight and directors Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett. 



The story revolves around a newlywed bride named Grace, played by Samara Weaving, who is marrying the son of a wealthy family that has made who knows how many millions off of board games. On the night of the wedding ceremony, Grace is told that she has to play a game with the family. It’s a tradition that anyone new joining the family has to play a game with them. Grace ends up pulling a card from a specific box, and the card says Hide and Seek. It then turns into an adult game of the classic children’s game, but instead of innocent fun, it turns into a game of survival as Grace is hunted down by the family. Can Grace survive until dawn, and why do they want to kill her? 


I adore movies like Ready or Not. It reminds me of my Upgrade review, what you see is what you get. Do you want a movie about a newlywed bride? You got it! You want to see said bride running for her life because a wealthy family has an insane and idiotic ritual when introducing people into the family? That’s there, too! Do you want the movie to be aware of its entire premise and have fun with it? It’s all there in this movie! The film is very aware of how insane the premise is, and runs with it! The family members are fleshed out to have their different quirks, but the film never comes off like it is trying to be like 21 Jump Street. It's aware, but it's not 100% winking at the audience. The family members are all on the same page, and are a blast to watch try and take down the bride. They are a threat and are dangerous, but some are bumbling, one of the family members is tired of this ritual, one is trying too hard, and the eldest sister is delightfully over-the-top. 



Of course, if the film was just all about the killer family, then it would have been boring. Most horror films fall into the trap of making the killer or threat the most interesting part, and it's understandable, but you do want to root for the lead characters, and you do so with Samara Weaving. You might remember the family members, but Samara is the one pulling everyone through this movie. She's smart and is quick on her feet. You root for her as she tries to outsmart the family members, and, as I mentioned above, she is also on the same page as everyone else. 


Now, in terms of ratio of action, scares, and comedy, it's pretty even. It's not "I'm going to be your next month of nightmare fuel” scary, but it will keep you on your toes and make you worry about what could be behind every corner, and who might be there with what weapon. The jokes are at the expense of the rich family. While Samara has her moments of good comedy, the family members are the individuals with the best lines and the best gags. They do show off a few jokes in the trailer, but there are still plenty of laughs and intense moments hidden from the trailers and marketing. 


The production values alone show that they had a vision of how they wanted every scene to look. The mansion itself is pleasantly gothic and archaic, the weapons used are old-fashioned, the lighting is perfectly dim, and the few CGI effects that are in the film are schlocky, but schlocky in the way you want them to be for a film like this. 



If I had one real major issue with the film, it's that some elements could have been taken a bit more to the extreme. The film does such a good job at flipping common and abused tropes used in horror films like this, and they are executed so well, that you wish they went a bit further. They could have used more gore, more dark comedy punchlines, more awareness, and maybe a slightly different ending. I won't spoil what happens for those who haven't seen it, but I wish they kept flipping the tropes around a touch more, even though I still like what happens with the ending. 



Sure, this isn't some masterpiece I'm going to expect to see at award season, and I'm sure it's not going to be in my final top 10 of 2019 live-action films, but it will definitely be a movie I can't wait to watch again. It's a film you rent or purchase for a fun laid-back Friday night get-together with friends. You get a few drinks and you watch the chaos unfold. I highly recommend checking this film out if you can find screenings for it, because its films like this that should be available in theaters. If you want more original projects getting major screen time, then you definitely need to see Ready or Not. It’s one where I will definitely be playing a game of Play it Again, Cam! 


Thanks for reading the review! I hope you all enjoyed it! If you feel like supporting my work, you can become a patron at patreon.com/camseyeview. I will see you all next time! 

9: Game Night Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated and live-action films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

One of the worst parts about comedy as a genre, is that due to the changing of the times with every decade, comedies age faster than most genres, maybe outside of romance films.  Some people will argue that political correctness is killing comedy because people are too sensitive. I 100% disagree, because that’s simply not the case. What is killing comedy are directors and writers doing things like letting actors improv too long, not telling actors to stop going off script, doing shock humor for shock sake, and not having a point to their humor. Why do you think people still watch films like Groundhog Day, Caddyshack, Animal House, Back to School, The Great Outdoors, Ghostbusters, The Blues Brothers, Airplane!, Life of Brian, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, The Producers, Space Balls, and so on? It’s because while having some elements that probably don’t hold up as well all the way through, they had great writing and characters. People laughed because they made fantastic jokes. This is why comedies from 2018 have been rather impressive, because they focus on what makes good comedies. This is why this review will be of the underrated Game Night, directed by John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein.


The story focuses on a competitive couple named Max and Annie Davis, played by Jason Bateman and Rachel McAdams. They are trying to have children, but Max is having trouble due to stress and the upcoming visit from his brother Brooks Davis, played by Kyle Chandler. Sadly for Max, that visit happens on one of their famous Game Nights that the couple has with their friends Ryan, played by Billy Magnussen, and Kevin and his wife Michelle, played by Lamorne Morris and Kylie Bunbury. Unfortunately for Max, Brooks decides to offer the idea that he will host the next game night. A week later, Max, Annie, Kevin, Michelle, Ryan, and Ryan’s co-worker Sarah, played by Sharon Horgan, go to Brook’s house that he’s renting for his visit, and find out that they are going to be doing a murder mystery game. Unfortunately for everyone involved, the game turns out to not be a game, and Brooks is kidnapped, and it’s up to Max, Annie, and their friends to try and get Brooks back and find out what the heck happened, and what is going on!


The strength of this film is definitely in its writing and characters. Instead of letting actors improv their lines, the directors and writers gave the actors actual characters and personalities. When you have a large group of characters who have to all be in the same scene, you have to make that work, and we have seen line-o-rama destroy that with scenes going on too long, talented people thinking they can improv, and the director not telling them to stop or to cut that scene. Luckily, Game Night is focused, and you enjoy the characters’ comradery when they are separated and together. You can tell what kind of person everyone is by their mannerisms, dialogue, and actions. Gee, when you have a focused goal and identity, it sure seems to make for a much better comedy than say, Holmes and Watson, Sisters, or Wine Country. Not only is the comedy really funny in this film, it does not focus on too many of the lazy tropes you find in comedy films like pop culture references, “hip” lingo, and so on. They had good jokes that were funny, because, well, they were funny.


On top of the great comedy in the movie, the film looks good! Another major problem with comedies is that when they have low budgets, or lackluster teams working on them, the lighting and set-up can make everything look too made-for-TV or look like a Netflix film release. It’s a major problem with a lot of Tyler Perry films and comedies like Night School. Luckily, the cinematography and the locations they go to look like there was some elbow grease put into them. They even have shots and locations set up that look like model landscapes or board pieces, which gives the film a nice touch and a pinch of personality. It might be a comedy, but it’s a comedy that’s shot like a crime thriller. It’s funny, but it’s also exciting and intense to watch the gang put the puzzle pieces together and try to figure out the overall plan. It has very entertaining action set pieces that also helps bring more to the table than other comedies.

Of course, a good comedy wouldn’t be successful, if the cast didn’t work. You have Jason Bateman, who already had a stacked resume with Zootopia, Arrested Development, and Ozark, and it was nice to see Rachel McAdams get a good boost from the disaster that was True Detective Season 2. The entire cast is good, but special mention has to go to Jesse “I’m going to be in everything you love” Plemons as Max and Annie’s neighbor Gary. He steals every scene that he is in, and always got the biggest laughs whenever he was used in the story. It just shows how versatile of an actor he is.


Now, no movie is perfect, and while I loved Game Night, I have a few complaints about it. I found the main antagonist to be pretty dull. He’s a generic British bad guy, and I wish he was written to be funnier. I also found that when everyone was separated, Lamorne Morris and Kylie Bunbury had the weakest story arc together. They had a few good lines and sequences, but their subplot was the weakest of the couples in the film. I also wish the finale had the others involved. It just cuts to Jason and Rachel’s character doing the last bit, and while it is fun to watch them work together to get Chandler from the grasps of the villain, it would have been fun to see what the others would have done to help.


Even with those complaints, Game Night is probably the best comedy of 2018, and while that year also had The Death of Stalin, Blockers, and films with comedic elements like The Favourite and Upgrade, Game Night is still the one that I enjoyed the most. It’s funny, well-written, entertaining, timeless, and it’s one of the few comedies that I bought on Blu-ray, and I don’t really do it that often. Game Night was a lot of fun, and I would be glad to come back to the next Game Night and say Play it again!

8: Moonstruck Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

This has been a year in the making. Last year, I felt badly that I didn’t get to do a review for Valentine’s Day that was a romantic comedy, but I got lazy and didn’t do one in time. It’s a bummer, because I love the genre, but don’t find myself really wanting to rewatch or own many of those types of films. Seems like today that we’ve got to have more romantic dramas, but sometimes, I just want a good earnest rom com. I can’t really think of a better one, than to talk about one of my all-time favorite movies, director Norman Jewison’s Moonstruck.


The story takes place in New York as we follow the life of Loretta Castorini, played by Cher. She is a widow that lives with her family and works as a bookkeeper. She decides that it’s time to get married again, and to get hooked with her boyfriend Johnny Cammareri, played by Danny Aiello. Unfortunately, they run into some trouble as Johnny has to go overseas to be with his dying mother. Johnny requests Loretta to go find his estranged brother to get him to come to the wedding. His brother’s name is Ronny Cammareri, played by Nicolas Cage. After meeting Ronny at his bakery, she tries to convince him back at his apartment, only to end up making love to him. It then turns into a dramatic love story of Loretta’s situation, Loretta’s father having an affair, and Loretta’s mother coping with what’s going on with her family.


The most standout feature of this film is how likable everyone is. You end up getting invested with everyone fairly quickly. I think it’s because of the sharp writing in the script by John Patrick Shanley. Everyone from the major characters to the minor characters have so much personality that while they might not always do good deeds, they pull you into the film’s world as you watch the story unfold. I have found myself quoting this movie along with my family multiple times a day, and that’s because the performances are incredible. I know it’s easy to look at Cher and poke at her other film experiences like Burlesque, but she is so good in this role! You feel for her being worried about getting married again, and watching her realize that getting married for the sake of it is not a good idea! I know we live in this society that cherishes marriage, but if you are getting married because that’s what your parents did, and not because you love your significant other, then that’s wrong. Nicolas Cage is also wonderful as the lead. Again, it’s easy to look at his recent film outings and laugh at how big of a nosedive his career took after a certain time period, but when he’s good, he’s incredible. While definitely playing up the overly dramatic side of his character, he does pull back and show his acting range. The entire cast is great. On top of Nicolas Cage and Cher, you have Olympia Dukakis, Vincent Gardenia, Julie Bovasso, Louis Guss, John Mahoney, Feodor Chaliapin Jr. and Anita Gillette. One of my favorite moments in the movie is actually between Olympia and John Mahoney’s characters. The entire film feels genuine with its emotions, writing, and development of the characters. It doesn’t feel forced, or take any weird twists and turns that would shatter the tone of the film, or have two unlikable characters get forced into loving one another. You don’t really see this in more modern romantic comedies, and it’s why I was so happy to see films like Crazy Rich Asians do well.


Moonstruck is simply one of the best rom coms of all time. It’s even one of the few that I know of that has major Academy Award recognition. I love watching it with my family every year, and I highly recommend it to anyone who is looking for a good romantic movie. Sure, it can be a bit cheesy with the accents, but it’s so touching, endearing, and joyful to watch, that any nitpicks I have for the film are easily ignored. It’s a film I’ll never get tired of watching, and I’ll be here next year to say Play it Again!

7: Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle Review

canva-photo-editor (91).png

(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

Recently, I have been getting more critical about how action and dumb fun are being handled in films. After a slew of disappointing or rather mediocre films have been released in 2018 that I listed in my Upgrade review, it seems like films these days are afraid of being simple entertainment. There is nothing wrong with being as good as you can be with certain stories and film genres. You don’t need to try to be more than what you are, which dooms most of these types of films. Films like Game Night don’t need to be any more complex than to simply focus on good writing, character dynamics, and good jokes. The same goes with today’s review of Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle, which was directed by Jake Kasdan, is one of 2017’s biggest surprises, and easily one of the best films that are aware of what they are and take advantage of it.

canva-photo-editor (92).png

The story revolves around four teenagers. A nerdy student named Spencer, played by Alex Wolff, a popular girl named Bethany, played by Madison Iseman, a jock named Anthony, played by Ser’Darius Blain, and a shy introvert named Martha, played by Morgan Turner. After getting into trouble at their school for different reasons, they are tasked with cleaning up a room full of random stuff as punishment. As they clean up, Spencer finds an old video game console with a game called Jumanji in it. He offers to play a quick game with everyone before getting back to work, only to be sucked into the game console. Not only that, but they end up as the characters they selected. This means that Spencer turns into Dr. Smolder Bravestone, played by Dwayne Johnson, Bethany turns into Professor Shelly Oberon, played by Jack Black, Anthony turns into Franklin “Mouse” Finbar, played by Kevin Hart, and Martha turns into Ruby Roundhouse, played by Karen Gillan. They are then tasked by an NPC to get the heart of Jumanji back to its rightful place, and avoid the evil hands of Russel Van Pelt, played by Bobby Cannavale. Along the way, they will have to face challenges, wild animals, and an encounter with a character named Jefferson McDonough, who is played by Nick Jonas, who was a teen from an earlier time of playing this game. Can they survive and not die in the game?

canva-photo-editor (93).png

So, what works about Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle? Well, for one, like I said above, it knows and is aware of what kind of movie it is. Sure, it has its commentary areas of the problem with judging people on face value, but for the most part, Welcome to the Jungle is a well-written, action-packed, and hugely entertaining action adventure flick. Since it takes place in a video game world, which I think is a clever and creative way to update the Jumanji concept, they take full advantage of having outlandish chase sequences, over-the-top hand-to-hand combat, and creative challenges that move the story forward, and develop everyone as characters. This is easily some of the most fun action that I have seen from a film this decade that wasn’t something like the Mission Impossible films.

canva-photo-editor (94).png

The other major highlight of the film is the cast they have for the video game avatars. This was going to be challenging, because you need the right actors to portray their teen counterparts, and you couldn’t have gotten a better cast than the four leads. Dwayne Johnson has easily become of the surprise actors of this decade, because he seems to know exactly how to approach his characters, and he’s usually given the right amount of material to work off of to make him easily one of the best things about the film. I think everyone got worried with how Kevin Hart was going to be in the film, and his recent controversy not withstanding (he didn’t handle the apology well at all), this is probably his best performance and my favorite performance of his outside of The Secret Life of Pets. It shows with good directing and an actual script, comedic actors can be good. Jack Black was also another curious addition, because you would think him having to portray the bratty popular girl would run itself to death, but Jack Black also turns into another huge highlight of the movie with comedy that reminds me why I love Jack Black as an actor. Karen Gillan does a great job being this introverted butt-kicking parody of Lara Croft, who, like many have said, is a much better Lara Croft than the other Tomb Raider films. Then again, when you have the same actress that plays Nebula in the Marvel films, why should anyone be surprised that she is just awesome? Even some of the more minor roles like Rhys Darby, who plays a literal non-playable video game character brings so much personality to the performance. Bobby Cannavale is just hilarious as the villain. He’s really one-dimensional, but you can tell he has so much fun playing this overly evil villain that lets bugs crawl in and out of his body. I think if you can’t have fun with a literal over-the-top villain, then you can’t be a good actor.

canva-photo-editor (95).png

Now, let’s talk about the big elephant in the room. I know many people do not like this movie because they love the original film from the 90s, and think this movie dumps all over the legacy of the first film. I mean, it really doesn’t. Plus, have people seen the first Jumanji film? It’s a decent 90s family film with the only noteworthy thing is that it’s fondly remembered, because of Robin Williams in it. It’s not even his best movie role. Like, I get childhood nostalgia can be one heck of a drug, but nostalgia also hides a lot of issues films from back in the day had. I have no personal connection to it, because I saw the film years later. It has shoddy effects, a clunky pacing to the story, and it’s really not as good as people remember it to be. If you love it, that’s perfectly fine. Don’t let my non-connection to it ruin it for you. You watch what you like, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise to stop watching it. With all that said, did this need to be a Jumanji sequel? That’s really the biggest problem here. Sony could have had a great new franchise, but they didn’t know if people would go see it unless it was connected to something nostalgic. Maybe this was the original intention, but at the same time, you could take the Jumanji elements out of the film, and you would still get a great action film that’s highly entertaining, and does a solid job making fun of video games. Now, with a sequel coming ahead, what are they going to do? They can’t go into the jungle again, because we already saw that? Will Jumanji shape into a different kind of video game genre? Will it be like a Zathura-style thing where it goes from jungles to outer space? That’s the kind of struggle the new film will be having to solve.

canva-photo-editor (96).png

Despite some minor elements, and the fact that Sony used the license for nostalgic reasons, Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle is frankly, one of the most fun and rewatchable films I have seen in a while. It has good writing, good acting, fun action, great jokes, and is one of the best surprises of the year. I hope they make a sequel that’s just as good as this one. Welcome to the Jungle was a great time that I wouldn’t mind saying Play it Again!

6: John Carpenter's The Thing Review

canva-photo-editor (64).png

(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com/camseyeview. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

I love watching horror movies. I try to watch as many as I possibly can during October. Unfortunately, I have been so busy this year with my job and other things that I have yet to really watch any, besides Hereditary, which I loved. Horror is another film genre that has hurdles to get over in being rewatchable. Not only do you have subjective tastes to deal with, once you know when all the scares are coming, that might lessen the experience. That means, for me, you would need to make sure everything around the scares work, like writing, effects, atmosphere, lighting, and what have you. I decided to choose a horror movie that I love and could watch hundreds of times without getting bored with it, The Thing, the 1982 remake by John Carpenter.

canva-photo-editor (65).png

The story follows a group of scientists working at an isolated base in Antarctica. One day, they see a helicopter of scientists from another base chasing a sled dog and trying to kill it. After dealing with the incident, they take in the sled dog. Later that night, they find out something odd about the dog. Unfortunately for them, they realize that the dog turns out to be a shape-shifting alien that ends up causing chaos at the base. Things turn from bad to worse when they understand that the alien has made it impossible for anyone to leave the base, and has hidden himself among the remaining people there. It then becomes a tense game of survival as the scientists try to find a way to get out of there, and to stop the alien from leaving Antarctica.

canva-photo-editor (66).png

It’s always interesting to read about the history of this film. It might be a classic now, but it was not back in the day, as it underperformed at the box office, along with many other films when E.T. came out. You can’t understate that E.T. killed a lot of good movies in its release area. Anyway, after being popular on TV and rental stores, it’s now a certified classic. Well, why? I mean, opinions change over time, but when I first saw this film for the first time a decade or so ago, I found it to be incredible. It’s easily one of the scariest movies I have seen in my life. First off, being isolated in one of the coldest places on earth is already horrifying. No real consistent way to contact the real world from that location is unsettling, but throw in an alien that can shapeshift, and the paranoia among the characters all add up to the overall experience. A lot of the film’s scares and tone are definitely molded by the film’s composer Ennio Morricone. While he is very well known for his work in films like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Once Upon a Time in the West, and Dario Argento’s Animal Trilogy, he also composed the music for The Hateful Eight, which can be argued to be a sort-of western version of The Thing. Anyway, Ennio’s music brings this minimalist unnerving atmosphere that gels well with the dark rooms, shadows, and the ever-present sense of someone among the crew not being who they say they are. It then becomes a ticking time bomb of slowly making sure that if anyone ends up being infected by the alien, they are taken care of immediately. What also works about this movie is that the scientists, while having their moments of rage-filled paranoia and stubborn pride, are smart. Sure, logic isn’t always the most important thing in a film when compared to the emotion and writing, but the fact that the characters don’t simply kill one another in mere seconds of finding out about the possibility of being infected is a nice change of pace. It’s always infuriating when the writing, tone, and atmosphere of a horror film is undone by characters doing something stupid that takes you out of the experience. The Thing is a slow burn-style horror film that easily makes the scares that happen in the film ten times more effective.

canva-photo-editor (67).png

The cast for this film is fantastic. Of course, you have John Carpenter mainstay Kurt Russell, but also Keith David, Wilford Brimley, T.K. Carter, David Clennon, Richard Dysart, Charles Hallahan, Peter Maloney, Richard Masur, Donald Moffat, Joel Polis, and Thomas Waites. Each actor is memorable in his own respective way. I think it also helps that everyone here looks normal. There is no chiseled cut 20 year-old-looking man. It makes it more believable when you have a bunch of people who look like they would actually work at this science outpost. However, one of the best characters in the movie is the alien itself. The special effects, done by Rob Bottin with the help of Stan Winston, the alien is nightmarish in its look, as it takes the incomplete form of a mass of skin, heads, arms, and blood. Anytime the alien is found out, it becomes a horrific scene of the alien morphing its form to try and take out the threat or get away. Some have said that the effects are too good, but I think that’s a positive. Nothing is worse than bad CGI effects or bad practical effects. This is meant to be a ghoulish monstrous alien lifeform. It should look utterly disgusting and very creature-like.

canva-photo-editor (68).png

I have no real critical issue with this version of The Thing. In terms of my horror criteria, it’s pretty much a perfect horror film. There is a reason the many comic adaptations and the terrible prequel film failed, and why more people prefer and love John Carpenter’s cinematic masterpiece. Could some of the characters have had more to them than what they got? Sure, but in the end, I was still invested from beginning to end with wanting every man there to survive and not get absorbed or killed by one of cinema’s most terrifying creatures. If for some reason you don’t own this movie, Shout! Factory has recently released a beautiful new enhanced version for blu-ray, and I can’t stop recommending this movie enough. I know it’s past Halloween, but that’s not going to stop me from saying, play it again!

5: Upgrade Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

What does Pacific Rim: Uprising, Peter Rabbit, Tomb Raider, Proud Mary, The Titan, Action Point, Gringo, The Outsider, Mute, and A Futile and Stupid Gesture have in common? These are just a handful of films I have seen this year, where I felt like we were supposed to get one kind of film, but either through bad marketing, or simply bad filmmaking, we didn’t get them. Some came closer than others to giving us what we wanted, but they all failed at certain levels. I decided to talk about a film that not only gives us what we want, but also more. The film in question is Upgrade, directed by Leigh Whannell.

canva-photo-editor (1).png

The story revolves around a stay-at-home mechanic named Grey Trace, played by Logan Marshall-Green. He does custom car requests while his wife, Asha, played by Melanie Vallejo, works for a high-tech company known as Cobolt. After taking a refurbished car to a client named Eron Keen, they get ambushed by a group of hitmen that leave Grey a quadriplegic and Asha dead. After moping around as a quadriplegic, Grey gets an offer from his last client, Eron Keen, played by Harrrison Gilbertson, to stick a highly advanced AI chip named STEM into the back of Grey’s neck that will help him walk again. After getting used to walking, Grey begins to hear the chip talking to him, and is voiced by Simon Maiden. He offers Grey the opportunity to find these hitmen and take them down, hoping to solve the mystery of who sent them, and why they killed his wife.

canva-photo-editor (2).png

When you first see the trailer, it looks like it’s going to be a hyper-violent sci-fi romp. Well, thankfully, while they do show most of the action scenes for probably marketing reasons, it’s so much fun! You know how The Revenant was shot to make you follow the action up close to make you feel like you were there? Upgrade does that in a similar way. Each time Grey lets STEM take over, the camera turns robotic and wonky, but not in a messy or amateur-hour sort of way. STEM essentially controls Grey like a puppet, so his movements match that whenever the action scenes decide to kick in. It makes for some of the best action that’s not from a superhero movie in 2018. It’s surprisingly gory, but that’s part of the fun. It’s brutal, in your face, and hugely entertaining to watch. Definitely don’t watch this if you get turned off by hyper-violence, but keep chugging along if you do! To make this not just a pulp violent schlockfest, the story that tackles the commentary about how far will we let technology go, and the overreliance of said technology, does lead to a really captivating mystery as to who sent the hitmen after Grey and his wife. I wasn’t really expecting that, because I was ready to succumb to the gory ride, but was glad to see there was more under the hood. It turns what you would find in a direct-to-video bargain bin from the 80s and 90s, into a rather captivating sci-fi thriller. It’s a fairly focused story that keeps you invested in Grey and his mission, and while it does sort of turn into a Black Mirror episode by the end, I loved it. Logan Marshall-Green does a great job at portraying a slightly jaded, but grounded individual, and brings a lot of great deliveries to the film’s nice splash of dark comedy. I mean, how would you act for the first time you let a highly advanced AI chip control your body without your control, and you kept seeing yourself do all of these amazing action film set-piece movements?

canva-photo-editor (5).png

With all that said, I do have one major problem with the film, and it’s the fact that out of 90 or so minutes, it takes up to 20 minutes to get to the stuff people want. Granted, the stuff they do show beforehand gets you invested into its story, but you wish that they either cut that part down a bit, or made the movie longer. While the action and story was great, I was always itching for one more action sequence. Just something more, but knowing how this is a partly Blumhouse-produced film, the budget wasn’t all that big, and they could only do so many action scenes. It just would have been nice, since the film repeats its structure after Grey gets STEM, and I personally felt like they could have added another action scene, due to how fun all of the action is. It makes you wonder what they could do with a sequel or spiritual successor to this film, if they set it up more in terms of John Wick Part 2’s pacing.

canva-photo-editor (4).png

Even despite all that, I found Upgrade to be one of 2018’s best surprises. It tackles its grimy sci-fi look perfectly, the action is some of 2018’s best, and the body-horror cybernetics that many of the characters have are effective. I wish it had a bit more action, and we got to the blood and grunge faster, but if you, for some reason, haven’t been able to see this film yet, definitely go buy it right now. I mean, if you are into this type of film. It’s a gory, bloody, pulpy, darkly comedic, and action-heavy ride that definitely wants me to yell “Play it Again, Cam!”

4: Ant-Man Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

So, I wanted to always tackle superhero films for these live-action reviews. However, no matter if they were DC, Marvel, or some other indie company, I never really want to rewatch them. I definitely enjoy the Marvel films, but I don’t ever think about watching all of them again. I would argue that maybe eight or so of the current Marvel films that have been made under the Disney banner are ones I would definitely rewatch. Since we are past the two giant Marvel films of the year with Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War, I decided to review the film starring our pint-size hero, Ant-Man by director Peyton Reed.


The story focuses on a recently released criminal/ex systems engineer named Scott Lang, played by Paul Rudd. After being released from prison, and failing to make a living for himself, he decides to take an offer to pull off a heist at a mansion owned by Hank Pym, played by Michael Douglas. After getting his crew, that includes Luis, played by Michael Pena, Dave, played by TIP Harris, and Kurt, played by David Dasmalchian, he breaks into the mansion to see what’s inside. Scott finds a large safe that includes a super suit. After putting the suit on, Scott realizes that the suit gives him the ability to shrink down to the size of an ant, or even smaller. Scott gets contacted by the creator of the suit, Hank Pym, and gets wrapped up into a mission to take down an individual who wants to weaponize Hank’s technology. Can he stop the maniacal Darren Cross, played by Corey Stoll, before he can take over the world with Hank’s inventions?

Before we get started, people are going to probably wonder if I side with the people who were mad that Edgar Wright was kicked off this project. Well, to be frank, I don’t care. I love the director, but this kind of stuff happens. The classic Wizard of Oz went through multiple directors and development changes. It doesn’t always end up with a good product, but I’m judging Ant-Man for what we received, and not bash the film, because the original director was going to be Edgar Wright. Now then, let’s get to the rest of the review.


I think what I like about this movie is that while it’s a superhero movie, and a superhero that could be considered an odd choice, they take full advantage of having fun with this premise.  The best way for superhero films to evolve is to simply be more than superhero films. I mean, that sounds weird, but let me explain. In spite of it being a Marvel superhero film, it’s more in line with a heist film. It doesn’t skimp on the fact that our hero is in a size-changing suit either. Anything that you can think of in the range of a normal Marvel film is done here. A lot of the best moments of the film are Paul Rudd changing size. Seeing him jump in the air, shrinking, running up a gun and knocking a henchman out, while in that tiny form, is a highlight of the film. Scenes like that are what make the film fun. Of course, the most memorable moment is with Ant-Man and Yellowjacket being tiny, and fighting on a Thomas the Tank Engine trainset. It’s flashy, funny, and you really get the scale of how small they are, and how big everything else is. I mean, when you have a superhero that can change his size, and control ants, you make sure that’s a huge focus. They somehow made ants adorable, and each species have their own distinct personalities. If this was a superhero film back in the early 2000s, this character would have suffered from bad adaptations, and no one really having an idea on how to use him. I think getting Paul Rudd as the lead character was the perfect choice. I like that while he can be tech savvy in certain areas, he’s more grounded as a normal guy among the more tech savvy individuals in the MCU. He also has charm for days. He is simply a great actor. Corey Stoll is also fun as the villain. He isn’t one of the greatest villains of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but he’s one of the more entertaining, because he’s just so slimy and obviously evil. Evangeline Lilly and Michael Scott are also great as Hank Pym and Hope Van Dyne, but they are pretty much secondary for the first film, and are way better utilized in the recently released sequel (which will also get a review in the future). Of course, everyone remembers and references Michael Peña as Luis, and how he has these amazing and incredibly hilarious ways of recapping stories. Whether this was part of Edgar Wright’s original script or not, these sequences bring in some of the best comedy in the Marvel films.


While I do find myself watching this movie a lot, I have some problems with it. Sometimes, the story doesn’t flow as well from one point to another, some of the jokes could have been cut out, the Baskin Robbins scene went on a bit too long, and it’s yet another origin story with some fairly predictable story beats. Granted, when this came out, it was a cleanser for the intense story and moments of Age of Ultron, but it could have had a bit more substance to the story and certain characters. I also found the Yellowjacket suit to be fairly generic-looking. At least the excuse you can have for Ant-Man’s suit is that the retro-style suit would not have translated at all into live-action. I wish there was a bit more creativity with his design.


Still, I love Ant-Man and it tends to be one of my personal favorites of the Marvel films from Disney. It’s creative, fun, I like Paul Rudd as Ant-Man, and I love watching it every time it’s on TV. This is why I love Marvel. They can take certain heroes from their catalog of characters, even the oddest heroes, and make them work. I would definitely recommend this one if you want something different from your normal superhero films. It’s an entertaining experience that makes me want to shrink down, and Play It Again!

3: The Death of Stalin Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

A comment I see in my line of writing/work is that people want politics to stay out of their video games, shows, and movies. Well, hate to be that guy, but politics are in everything. Every artistic decision has some kind of leaning or belief behind it. You literally can’t escape it, and there is nowhere to go when you are watching a political comedy. These are films that I tend to not really want to watch, because I want to be engaged with the jokes, the writing, the characters, and the story. Yes, I’m expecting a political point of view in the writing and directing, but if that’s all I’m seeing, then you are going to simply get labeled as propaganda, which sadly happens more than you would think. Thankfully, I recently watched a really funny comedy that I wish more people could see, The Death of Stalin, directed by Armando Iannucci.


It’s the 1950s, and the tyrannical Stalin, played by Adrian McLoughlin, is the big cheese in Russia. Well, that is until he has a stroke and falls to the ground dead as a door nail. This causes all of his close personal co-workers/friends, like Nikita Khruschev, played by Steve Buscemi, Laverntiy Beria, played by Simon Russell Beale, Vyacheslav Molotov, played by Michael Palin, Gorgy Malenkov, played by Jeffery Tambor, and so on, to panic. I mean, their leader is dead! It then becomes this mad dash to see who becomes the leader of Russia, who get what position of power, and who they need to sway to get on their good side. Let’s just say that this leads to some clever and well-written shenanigans.


I think what really gels about this film is how its political comedy works, and how the film survives as its own comedy. I mean, what’s funnier than to see a tyrannical government lose its head like a chicken, and run around in a panic, as they all try to get ahead of one another and backstab whoever in order to get the job done? I mean, yes, a lot of what people have said is true, that the buffoonery from the entire committee is very telling in how it mirrors our current political climate, but even if you took that part out, it’s still really funny. I mean, it’s almost too comical in how obvious they are trying to get ahead of one another, trying to make sure they still get their nice seat on the committee, and not end up on one of the infamous kill lists. Another aspect of the comedy I liked is that it also has other bits of humor, like having little background gags from time to time. This film has probably the most consistent laughs that I have seen in a comedy from 2018. Everyone delivers great lines, there are fantastic performances, and it finds a way to balance out the laughs and the fact that these are people who have done some unquestionably horrible things. It does not shy away from the fact that this government has kept their people under an iron fist, and have either banished, tortured, or killed whoever they needed.


I like the actors chosen for the roles. While I definitely love Steve Buscemi as the calm-headed middle man, Simon Russell Beale as the power hungry individual, Rupert Friend as Stalin’s constantly drunk son, Jeffery Tambor as the bumbling incompetent right hand, and a lot of the major cast, I have to pinpoint that the best character in the film was Jason Isaacs as Georgy Shukov. Isaacs plays this macho foul-tempered man, and he steals every scene that he is in. He has the best lines, the best introduction to his character, and it was simply fun to see Jason Isaacs again. Really, the best thing about this film is that everyone had a good role, a funny line, a humorous sequence, and no one felt like dead weight or was unnecessary.


My one major complaint about the film is that the last third, while still entertaining, doesn’t balance out the comedy and drama as well as the first two-thirds of the film. It tends to lean more on the dramatic side of things, and while I definitely understand why the film went that way, I wish it was more like the first two-thirds. Then again, when you are about to cause a mutiny with one of your longest standing co-workers, filling out the sequence with jokes probably would have been in bad taste. I almost forgot to put this in, but after what has been going on in Hollywood, it is awkward to see Jeffery Tambor in the film. He’s funny and he plays his part well, but like TJ Miller in Ready Player One, it’s unfortunate timing to be seeing him in this film.


I really loved The Death of Stalin. It was a comedy I was not expecting to enjoy, and it was a film I came out of smiling from ear to ear. Unlike some comedies, I think The Death of Stalin will still hold up years from now. While it can definitely be connected to our current political climate, with who’s in office and our conflict with Russia, I feel like you can take the film and place it during different points in history, and somehow find a way to connect the characters and actions to certain points in time. I have seen this twice as of writing this review, and I definitely will want to see it again. It’s a political comedy that aims for a home run, and hits it out of the park. You will definitely want to play it again!

2: The Big Sick Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

Parental Warning/Heads Up!: This film has a good chunk of adult jokes, cursing, and might not be suitable for younger viewers. Viewer’s discretion is advised. Thanks for reading this.

A genre I find struggling and stumbling across the finish line many times are films of the comedy/romance genre. Sure, there are plenty of films with great romantic chemistry between characters, but films in the comedy/romance genre don’t tend to have a lot of variety to them, and while there are plenty of classics in the genre, not many know how to keep it fresh and interesting. At worst, most romantic comedies tend to come off very cookie cutter, and on the rare occasion, unintentionally come off as the characters being really terrible people. It’s tough, since you want to have an amazing story, or a very well-executed story with characters you want to invest your time into and want to get together. I definitely don’t find romance-focused films to have a lot of rewatchability, but I have definitely found a few that make me want to say “play it again!” What films am I talking about? For this review, it’s the 2017 hit The Big Sick, which was directed by Michael Showalter, produced by Judd Apatow and Barry Mendel, and written by Emily V Gordon and Kumail Nanjiani.


The Big Sick talks about the real life story of how our star Kumail Nanjiani is a Pakistani standup comedian in Chicago. While trying to get his big break, he meets who would be his future wife Emily V. Gordon, who in this film is named Emily Gardner, played by Zoe Kazan. They hit it off, and become romantically connected, while he has to deal with his family trying to hook him up with Pakistani women. One day, Emily gets dangerously ill, and ends up in a coma. Kumail not only has to deal with that, but also her parents played by Ray Romano and Holly Hunter. Will Emily make it out alive? What will happen when Kumail interacts with her parents?


This might sound clichéd and film snobbish, but The Big Sick’s greatest offering is how much heart and soul is in this story. When you hear about a movie coming out that is based on a real life story/event, you get thoughts of the studio romanticizing the entire event or turning it into propaganda for a certain group of individuals. Thankfully, this is not the case with this story. Everything from the acting, the writing, the jokes, to the arc of the story felt genuine. No one is acting like caricatures of the tropes you see in romantic-comedies. Even the members of Kumail’s family in the film would normally be played as the butt of the joke, but are not.  It’s refreshing to see a romance story that’s more grounded. Yes, I love films like Moonstruck that have more comedic characteristics and expressive characters, but playing it grounded was needed for this story.


The actors all worked off each other well, and the comedy was really funny. I mean, I wasn’t holding my sides or out of breath, but the jokes were legit hilarious. So many comedies these days want to have the comedy stars adlib their lines, and it gets tiring when the director doesn’t tell them to stop or try out different takes. I think what makes it all work is that the film isn’t trying to make some out-of-touch fantasy setting like The Back Up Plan. Everything from the small talk to the awkward words of wisdom all connected to me while I was watching. I have been in situations where good comedy came out of small talk, and talks of wisdom ended up not sounding as good out-loud. I also think the story works because of the actors themselves. I am not fully familiar with Kumail, besides some voice-over roles in films like LEGO Ninjago and his guest appearances on HarmonQuest, and I was curious if he could hold the film as the lead. To my happy surprise, Kumail was funny, charming, kind, and incredibly likable. This is definitely one actor in Hollywood that you should be following.  Of course, the actress playing Emily, Zoe Kazan, does a great job with a believable quirkiness to her, and as many people have pointed out, Holly Hunter and Ray Romano nail it as Emily’s parents. Both have some of the best acting in their careers. Don’t worry, Ray, your performance here makes up for the last couple of Ice Age films. Seriously though, this film has some of my favorite performances of 2017. They do a great job balancing out the comedy and the drama. When the characters are feeling good, you can feel that, and when they are hurt or in pain, again, you feel that.


It’s good, as a film critic, to point out the pros and the cons for every film, though, I can’t really find anything that would be considered a deal breaker. Maybe the film is a touch long at almost two hours? Then again, I can’t really think of any scenes I would cut out. While this film does expand on a familiar formula, some of the more “predictable” sequences did come up, but due to how the overall film was executed, the story had me hooked. I’m trying to find something that I could really say hurt the film, but The Big Sick set out in its goal to tell a compelling and loving story about how Kumail met Emily, and it did a fantastic job at what it set out to do.


The Big Sick was wonderful and charming. I was so happy it was a case of a good trailer that ended up with an amazing movie, and one of my favorites from 2017. I have to hand it to Kumail for taking a genre of film that is hard to make good these days, and make a real-to-life story about him from his days as a stand-up comedian, his relationship with his family, and Emily, to even her parents. It’s widely available on Amazon Prime for free, but even if you don’t have Prime, buy the movie. Kumail and Emily hit it out of the park, and they made a movie that will definitely make me want to play it again!

1: From Dusk Till Dawn Review


(If you like what you see, you can go to camseyeview.biz to see more of my work on video game reviews, editorials, lists, Kickstarters, developer interviews, and review/talk about animated films. If you would like, consider contributing to my Patreon at patreon.com. It would help support my work, and keeps the website up. Thanks for checking out my work, and I hope you like this review!)

Parental Warning/Heads Up!: This film is not meant for kids! It includes swearing, violence, nudity, graphic content, guns worn around the groin, sex, cursing, gore, and so on. Do not show this to your kids. Viewer’s discretion is advised. I will also be talking about the movie as a whole, since I can’t talk about it without spoiling it.


When I was picking films to review for Play it Again, I wanted to not pick typical super-cheesy or sleazy schlock. Even when it comes to making schlock, there is an art and proper execution for making B movie-style films. Sure, you can be more violent, over-the-top, self-aware, or sexual, but it doesn’t mean you can slack off in the other departments. It’s why I found the perfect film for this whole philosophy of well-made B movie entertainment that is more A-grade than B-grade. What film is that? It’s the Quinten Tarantino-written and Robert Rodriguez-directed, From Dusk Til Dawn.


The story follows two brothers, Seth and Richie Gecko, played by George Clooney and Quentin Tarantino. They are running away from the police after pulling off a heist, killing some people, and taking a bank teller hostage. They stop at a hotel, and end up taking a family including an ex-priest, Jacob Fuller, played by Harvey Keitel, his daughter Katherine Fuller, played by Juliette Lewis, and his adopted son, Scott Fuller, played by Ernest Liu. The two brothers end up using them to get across the border to Mexico. Seth tells the family that they are going to a strip club called The Titty Twister to wait for his “business” partner to arrive there at dawn. Unfortunately for them, after seeing a tantalizing dance from a stripper, played by Salma Hayek, they end up finding out, along with the other truckers and bikers, that The Titty Twister is a hive of vampires! Stuff hits the fan, and they have to find a way to survive until dawn. They team up with a biker named Sex Machine, played by Tom Savini, and a Vietnam vet named Frost, played by Fred Williamson. Can they make it out alive, or will the vampires be having an “all you can drink” buffet?


The first criticism I hear about this film all the time is the tonal shift. At first, it starts out as a fairly serious and imposing crime thriller. Every scene with the two brothers and the kidnapped bank-teller is filled with constant dread, due to how violent the two can be. Then halfway through, it turns into a B-movie with a stripper joint being the den of a horde of vampires. I can understand that being very jarring to some people, but at the same time, did people not see the shootout at the beginning of the film? Yeah, it had its serious moments, but it was also fun to watch, as you wait to see who pulled the trigger first. I can respect that back when this was released, this was jarring, and people didn’t like getting caught off-guard due to the sudden change, but if you sit back, and let it happen, it turns into one of the most entertaining tributes to B-movies of all of cinema. I think some people forget a lot of B-movies would have sudden change in tone or plot, and a lot of them are fondly remembered. There is just something so tantalizing about watching this film from start to finish.


From the quick witty writing of Tarantino, to one of Robert Rodriguez’s best directorial works, it’s a blast to watch all the characters work off one another to survive until dawn and to not be bitten or turned into vampires themselves. All the characters are memorable, and all have pretty great lines. It’s easily a film I quote when I’m talking with friends or quoting it back and forth with my parents. Yeah, I had cool parents who loved movies like this. The bar scene is especially memorable as you start from the dusty roads outside the bar, a loud and maniacal Cheech Marin, who is in this film three times, barking out that the girls are hot, and you walk in with the killer rock band, and Danny Trejo being your bartender. Of course, one of the most iconic scenes is the sexy and sultry dance done by Salma Hayek. It’s a bit sleazy, but it’s a strip joint, there is no Build-a-Bear Workshop built in. For the most part, the practical effects for the vampire make-up are superb, as everyone looks disgusting and monstrous. They even throw in a rat monster, just because they could. Some of the early CGI-dissolves look dated, but you don’t really focus on that when Tom Savini has a revolver gun around his groin and isn’t afraid to use it.


Even through all this madness, there is still this emotional investment with making sure everyone makes it out alive. While some characters get the short end of the stick, like Frost, you still feel bad for anyone that gets bitten or killed. It’s weird to say you stay emotionally invested when this sounds like an utter schlockfest, but you do. I wish some characters could have stuck around a little more, we could have gotten some other monster designs, and seen the sweet weapons in the final confrontation used more, but I don’t have a lot to complain about.


From Dusk Til Dawn can be sleazy, jarring, scary, funny, full of cursing, blood, and action-packed vampire killing, but that’s also why I love it so much. It knew how to execute everything, and it makes for one of the craziest rides of 1996. I know this film got a sequel, a prequel, and a retelling of the entire mythos in the form of a TV series, but really, all you need or really want to see is the first movie. It’s widely available, and if you are into fun movies with a unique flavor to them, then by all means, pick up this awesome gem. As far as I can tell, From Dusk Til Dawn might be one of my all-time favorite movies, and is easily one where I will be saying, “Play it Again, Cam!”

Play it Again, Cam! Introduction

So, as a critic, I have been reviewing animated films for two years now, and covering gaming for 10 years on my website, camseyeview.biz. However, I feel like if I am to grow as a critic, I need to review something else. If I want to expand and widen my audience, I need to review the next evolution of animated films, live-action films! However, my opinions on most movies don’t really go down a different path, than what most people think of the films that come out every year. I loved Moonlight, Mad Max: Fury Road was fantastic, I didn’t like Baywatch, I thought CHiPS was the worst movie of 2017, and you get the idea. I had to decide where I wanted to go with these reviews, and then it came to me. I was going to review movies that I found to be not only good, but ones that made me want to say, “Play it Again!”.  A lot of my favorite movies every year are the films that make me go “I want to see that again”. Yes, the Oscar films are usually pretty good, but I never find myself wanting to rewatch them. I want to tackle those films I won’t get sick of. These are your Logan Lucky, your From Dusk Til Dawn, your Ant-Man, your Uncle Buck, and your Moonstruck, etc.. Sure, some of them might be major award winners, but they will mostly be the films that the Academy might avoid giving awards to.

So, here are the rules. The films in question are chosen by a highly intellectual team of me, myself, and I. This means that these reviews are going to be of my subjective opinion. If you don’t agree with it, that’s fine, but do not get at me for liking a movie you didn’t. Oh, and to be clear, just because I don’t find it rewatchable, doesn’t mean I hate the movie itself. It simply means that it’s a great movie that I don’t want to watch again.

The next rule is that the films that qualify for these reviews must be at the very least 75-100% rewatchable. This means I won’t choose films that some critics like to say “only watch for the last 20 minutes”. I find that way of thinking damaging to film criticism, since who wants to spend money on a movie to simply watch the last 20 minutes? I never want to suggest a movie that’s only partly good, because I’d rather you spend money or your time watching a film that only has a few flaws.

The third and final rule (for now) is that I won’t be covering animated movies. I already do that with The Other Side of Animation. It has to be live-action and only live-action. I might bend the rules if there is an animated sequence in the film, but if it’s half-animated and half-live-action, then that’s going to The Other Side of Animation.

I hope you enjoy these reviews!